Candidate Obama declared that “America deserves a leader who speaks truthfully about the Armenian genocide”. However, he has not done so, while his administration still opposes the resolution, reads the article by Tim Rutten published in the Los Angeles Times.

“The line between prudence and moral cowardice can be a fine one, particularly when it comes to the conduct of diplomacy. For Americans, the question of where and how to make such distinctions has a particular urgency this week, as we commemorate the 96th anniversary of the genocide inflicted on the Armenians by the Ottoman Turks. Here in California, where the descendents of those who escaped the genocide have made such a vibrant contribution to agriculture, business, the professions and public life, memorials of the tragedy are solemn annual events,” he writes.

The author notes that Congress has considered resolution that would recognize Armenian Genocide but Turkey, a key U.S. ally and NATO partner objects to its adoption.

“Rather than offend the Turks, who threaten retaliation if Congress approves the resolution, this administration, like its predecessors, opposes the designation. Clarity, though, is something the president seems determined to avoid, as he attempts to maintain the support of Armenian voters while soothing Turkish sensibilities,” journalist writes recalling that Armenian Genocide is widely documented.