An interview with the third president of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, has been discussed in Armenian society since yesterday. However, it is significant not from the point of view of what was said, but from the point of view of the rarity of his performances, Hraparak daily reported.

“By the way, the first thought that comes up when watching the interview is why he didn’t speak before, especially during his time in power. Respect for the public would be manifested in this way too. He would be accountable to it. But today, of course, it is good that the ex-president is a person with a role in political life, speaks, explains, answers questions, opens the brackets, albeit with a delay. This will also help in clarifying public attitudes towards the political force he leads. But it should be noted that after the interview, new questions arose. (...) Of course, hindsight, you can blame other people, such as Karen Karapetyan (former Prime Minister of Armenia - ed.), And say that “I handed over power to him, he handed it over to Nikol Pashinyan”.

But they still understand that power should have been transferred much earlier, and not on April 23, when it de facto belonged to Pashinyan in the country? You can also represent the bright side of the negotiation process, proposals that were beneficial to us. But, nevertheless, the fact remains that these proposals remained on paper, and there were no guarantees that if Serzh Sargsyan remained in power, he would be able to bring them to their logical conclusion. And, finally, when he says that he knew that Pashinyan was leading to war, the question arises: what did he do to prevent the war and warn of its danger?” the daily reports.