Past daily of Armenia writes as follows, in particular: Even a cursory observation of the Azerbaijani and especially Turkish media—or rather, the propaganda media—enables to generalize several main theories.

It is worth recalling in passing that the overwhelming majority of hostile propaganda media are state “ideological” and “within the lines.” That is, in this case it not only about pure propaganda, but about the reflection of the real approaches of the Turkish and Azerbaijani ruling circles in them.

The first of the general theories of the Turkish-Azerbaijani propaganda is that they have demands from Armenia, they have conditions in their “relations” with Armenia, and in terms of fulfilling them, [Armenian PM Nikol] Pashinyan and his government are simply ideal more than the Turkish-Azerbaijani tandem could not have dreamed of. In short, the Turkish propaganda assesses the situation quite objectively from this point of view, noting that Pashinyan and his government act in line with their demands and are therefore beneficial.

The main thing that worries the Turkish and Azerbaijani propaganda machine, namely, that there should be “no one to hinder Pashinyan,” that there should be no one who annoys Pashinyan. This, in their perception, is the most important thing.
This is where their other theories about the so-called “revanchists” comes from. Accordingly, all those Armenians, those figures, political forces who do not keep pace with Pashinyan’s “Turkish march” are characterized as “revanchists”.
(…). As for the Turkish-Azerbaijani theory of "revanchism," the main concern of the propaganda circulating it is that "their"

Pashinyan will not suddenly be touched, that the government in Armenia will not suddenly change, and especially that national, "uncompromising" forces will not suddenly come to power [in Armenia].